Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They seem to be preparing for something in the 2-5 years timeframe, but what?

Least grandiose theory I can come with: two ARM cores in the Watch, one big, one small, with different instruction sets, for active/standby modes.



They're preparing for anything. Apple has a dislike for relying heavily on any partner in their DNA, thanks to PowerPC.


I think this is exactly it. Perhaps they do have a specific usage in mind that they're aiming for, but I bet they'd be taking these same steps regardless.


Not just that. Apple also switched from 68k to PowerPC.


True, though nominally the same partner. Motorola was the M in AIM, though yes, IBM did the heavy lifting. (Remember Motorola made a Mac clone? How weird.) And the situation wasn't as dire then.


I'm guessing they can just optimize for the watch when they come up with a new trick.

It also means they can optimize for different devices.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: