Initially I'd have agreed, but it seems more subtle than that.
Let's read from Verizon's "Postpay Device Unlocking Policy"
> ... We do not lock our 4G LTE devices, and no code is needed to program them for use with another carrier.
So I take this as "we don't have a subsidy lock that prevents you from moving this phone to another LTE vendor."
Indeed, they clarify later:
> “Unlocking” a device refers only to disabling software that would prevent a consumer from attempting to activate a device designed for one carrier’s network on another carrier’s network, even if that network is technologically compatible.
But these phones do ship with signed bootloaders, and it doesn't sound like Verizon provides the mechanism to replace it.
It doesn't sound like this re-legitimizes 3rd party businesses who offer unlocking services. TFA refers to FCC negotiations with carriers, and not the LoC changing policy. I'll wager that's the only thing that would let you install your own OS.
Let's read from Verizon's "Postpay Device Unlocking Policy"
> ... We do not lock our 4G LTE devices, and no code is needed to program them for use with another carrier.
So I take this as "we don't have a subsidy lock that prevents you from moving this phone to another LTE vendor."
Indeed, they clarify later:
> “Unlocking” a device refers only to disabling software that would prevent a consumer from attempting to activate a device designed for one carrier’s network on another carrier’s network, even if that network is technologically compatible.
But these phones do ship with signed bootloaders, and it doesn't sound like Verizon provides the mechanism to replace it.
It doesn't sound like this re-legitimizes 3rd party businesses who offer unlocking services. TFA refers to FCC negotiations with carriers, and not the LoC changing policy. I'll wager that's the only thing that would let you install your own OS.